<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 1451 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459351</link>
    <description>The authority was required to decide the preliminary objection on the maintainability of the summons before proceeding further. After hearing the petitioner, the first respondent was directed to consider that threshold issue, and all further proceedings pursuant to the summons were kept in abeyance until orders were passed on maintainability. The matter therefore turned on prior determination of the summons&#039; validity before any continuation of the underlying proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2024 19:00:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=781879" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 1451 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459351</link>
      <description>The authority was required to decide the preliminary objection on the maintainability of the summons before proceeding further. After hearing the petitioner, the first respondent was directed to consider that threshold issue, and all further proceedings pursuant to the summons were kept in abeyance until orders were passed on maintainability. The matter therefore turned on prior determination of the summons&#039; validity before any continuation of the underlying proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459351</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>