https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459356 A civil suit challenging obstruction of a requisitioned extraordinary general meeting was held maintainable despite an objection that the parties should have gone to the company law forum, because the pleaded dispute over voting rights and the requisition process could not be adequately resolved there on the facts. Interim protection was also granted: the Court found a strong prima facie case that the requisition was supported by Section 100 of the Companies Act, 2013, Rule 17(7) of the Companies (Management and Administration) Rules, 2014, and the company's articles, and held that balance of convenience and irreparable injury favoured preserving the meeting process. The respondents were directed to comply with the requisition notice and furnish the shareholders' list. en-us Thu, 19 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Dec 2024 19:00:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459356 A civil suit challenging obstruction of a requisitioned extraordinary general meeting was held maintainable despite an objection that the parties should have gone to the company law forum, because the pleaded dispute over voting rights and the requisition process could not be adequately resolved there on the facts. Interim protection was also granted: the Court found a strong prima facie case that the requisition was supported by Section 100 of the Companies Act, 2013, Rule 17(7) of the Companies (Management and Administration) Rules, 2014, and the company's articles, and held that balance of convenience and irreparable injury favoured preserving the meeting process. The respondents were directed to comply with the requisition notice and furnish the shareholders' list. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 19 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459356