<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 568 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459343</link>
    <description>A provisional plot allotment that was never perfected by compliance with the governing conditions did not create an indefeasible right, and a later award directing allotment of the same plot was unenforceable because a necessary party had not been impleaded and the order went beyond jurisdiction. Section 47 of the Registration Act, 1908 did not alter the effect of the subsequent registered sale deed. A society member was entitled only to fair consideration for allotment under the rules, bye-laws and seniority, not to a specific plot as of right, although monetary redress and refund could still be granted for the society&#039;s unfair conduct.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2024 15:58:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=781831" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 568 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459343</link>
      <description>A provisional plot allotment that was never perfected by compliance with the governing conditions did not create an indefeasible right, and a later award directing allotment of the same plot was unenforceable because a necessary party had not been impleaded and the order went beyond jurisdiction. Section 47 of the Registration Act, 1908 did not alter the effect of the subsequent registered sale deed. A society member was entitled only to fair consideration for allotment under the rules, bye-laws and seniority, not to a specific plot as of right, although monetary redress and refund could still be granted for the society&#039;s unfair conduct.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459343</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>