<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court allows Input Tax Credit claim despite e-way bill mismatch; directs to pay remaining tax within 2 weeks.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83842</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the impugned order rejecting the petitioner&#039;s claim of Input Tax Credit (ITC) u/s 16(4) of the GST Act due to a discrepancy between the e-way bill and GSTR-3B. The petitioner was directed to deposit the entire tax due of Rs. 87,129/- on issues other than the rejection of ITC invoking Section 16(4) within two weeks from the receipt of the court order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2024 08:58:16 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2024 08:58:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=781747" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court allows Input Tax Credit claim despite e-way bill mismatch; directs to pay remaining tax within 2 weeks.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83842</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the impugned order rejecting the petitioner&#039;s claim of Input Tax Credit (ITC) u/s 16(4) of the GST Act due to a discrepancy between the e-way bill and GSTR-3B. The petitioner was directed to deposit the entire tax due of Rs. 87,129/- on issues other than the rejection of ITC invoking Section 16(4) within two weeks from the receipt of the court order.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2024 08:58:16 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83842</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>