<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 477 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762897</link>
    <description>CESTAT Chennai set aside the suspension of a customs broker&#039;s license under CBLR 2018. The court found that revenue authorities failed to complete proceedings within the prescribed 270-day timeframe (90+90+90 days) for alleged violations from October/November 2022, with only suspension action taken after nearly two years. The tribunal held that prolonged inaction by authorities caused miscarriage of justice, affecting the appellant&#039;s livelihood and employees. Balance of inconvenience favored the appellant, as continuing business operations would not harm revenue interests. The suspension order was set aside, allowing license restoration while permitting authorities to conclude initiated proceedings according to law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2024 08:58:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=781701" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 477 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762897</link>
      <description>CESTAT Chennai set aside the suspension of a customs broker&#039;s license under CBLR 2018. The court found that revenue authorities failed to complete proceedings within the prescribed 270-day timeframe (90+90+90 days) for alleged violations from October/November 2022, with only suspension action taken after nearly two years. The tribunal held that prolonged inaction by authorities caused miscarriage of justice, affecting the appellant&#039;s livelihood and employees. Balance of inconvenience favored the appellant, as continuing business operations would not harm revenue interests. The suspension order was set aside, allowing license restoration while permitting authorities to conclude initiated proceedings according to law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762897</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>