<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 489 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762909</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding transfer pricing adjustment. CIT(A) had rejected TPO&#039;s selection of CUP as most appropriate method and deleted adjustment on arm&#039;s length price for commission payments to associated enterprise. ITAT upheld CIT(A)&#039;s decision, noting consistency with previous years&#039; orders for similar facts and absence of evidence that earlier CIT(A) orders were reversed by higher authorities. ITAT found CIT(A)&#039;s order well-reasoned and requiring no interference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2024 08:58:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=781689" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 489 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762909</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding transfer pricing adjustment. CIT(A) had rejected TPO&#039;s selection of CUP as most appropriate method and deleted adjustment on arm&#039;s length price for commission payments to associated enterprise. ITAT upheld CIT(A)&#039;s decision, noting consistency with previous years&#039; orders for similar facts and absence of evidence that earlier CIT(A) orders were reversed by higher authorities. ITAT found CIT(A)&#039;s order well-reasoned and requiring no interference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762909</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>