<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 495 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762915</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai quashed assessment orders passed under sections 153A/143(3) for non-compliance with mandatory provisions of section 144C. The AO failed to issue draft assessment orders before passing final assessment orders for eligible assessees, including non-residents and foreign companies. Following the Finance Act 2020 amendment effective from April 1, 2020, all non-residents became eligible assessees requiring adherence to section 144C procedures when variations prejudicial to assessee interests are proposed. The tribunal relied on Delhi HC&#039;s decision in Principal Commissioner of Income Tax vs Sumitomo Corporation India, which similarly quashed final assessment orders passed without draft orders. The appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2024 15:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=781683" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 495 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762915</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai quashed assessment orders passed under sections 153A/143(3) for non-compliance with mandatory provisions of section 144C. The AO failed to issue draft assessment orders before passing final assessment orders for eligible assessees, including non-residents and foreign companies. Following the Finance Act 2020 amendment effective from April 1, 2020, all non-residents became eligible assessees requiring adherence to section 144C procedures when variations prejudicial to assessee interests are proposed. The tribunal relied on Delhi HC&#039;s decision in Principal Commissioner of Income Tax vs Sumitomo Corporation India, which similarly quashed final assessment orders passed without draft orders. The appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762915</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>