<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 512 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762932</link>
    <description>The Orissa HC note records that where an efficacious statutory appeal is available, writ jurisdiction will ordinarily not be exercised to test a demand for late fee or a request for waiver. The petitioner&#039;s reliance on a notification and the assertion that the tribunal was not functioning did not displace the availability of the prescribed appellate remedy. The petition was therefore disposed of, with the petitioner directed to pursue the statutory appeal and seek relief before the competent appellate forum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 21:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=781666" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 512 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762932</link>
      <description>The Orissa HC note records that where an efficacious statutory appeal is available, writ jurisdiction will ordinarily not be exercised to test a demand for late fee or a request for waiver. The petitioner&#039;s reliance on a notification and the assertion that the tribunal was not functioning did not displace the availability of the prescribed appellate remedy. The petition was therefore disposed of, with the petitioner directed to pursue the statutory appeal and seek relief before the competent appellate forum.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762932</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>