https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762936 Challenge to a show cause notice seeking quashing on jurisdictional grounds was held premature because the allegations require factual determination and the petitioner had not filed a reply to the SCN; consequently the writ petition was dismissed for prematurity. The reasoning emphasises that disputes over the proper adjudicating authority and factual allegations of generation of fake input tax credits via fake invoices and cash transactions cannot be resolved on writ without adjudicatory fact-finding, and procedural failure to engage with the SCN (no reply filed) weighed against entertainability. en-us Fri, 22 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Jan 2026 14:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762936 Challenge to a show cause notice seeking quashing on jurisdictional grounds was held premature because the allegations require factual determination and the petitioner had not filed a reply to the SCN; consequently the writ petition was dismissed for prematurity. The reasoning emphasises that disputes over the proper adjudicating authority and factual allegations of generation of fake input tax credits via fake invoices and cash transactions cannot be resolved on writ without adjudicatory fact-finding, and procedural failure to engage with the SCN (no reply filed) weighed against entertainability. Case-Laws GST Fri, 22 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762936