<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 1554 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459337</link>
    <description>The Tribunal condoned a 314-day delay in filing an appeal before the CIT(A), emphasizing substantial justice over technicalities. The delay, attributed to a bonafide error in the first year of electronic filing, was deemed excusable. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, and the case was remitted to CIT(A) for a fresh merits decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2024 19:09:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=781622" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 1554 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459337</link>
      <description>The Tribunal condoned a 314-day delay in filing an appeal before the CIT(A), emphasizing substantial justice over technicalities. The delay, attributed to a bonafide error in the first year of electronic filing, was deemed excusable. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, and the case was remitted to CIT(A) for a fresh merits decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459337</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>