<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (12) TMI 1385 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI - LB</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459330</link>
    <description>The limitation period for filing an appeal under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was held to run from the date of pronouncement of the order, not from the date of uploading. Because the proviso to Section 61(2) allows condonation only up to 15 days beyond the prescribed period, a 17-day delay fell outside the Tribunal&#039;s power to condone it. The condonation application was therefore rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2024 19:05:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=781616" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (12) TMI 1385 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI - LB</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459330</link>
      <description>The limitation period for filing an appeal under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was held to run from the date of pronouncement of the order, not from the date of uploading. Because the proviso to Section 61(2) allows condonation only up to 15 days beyond the prescribed period, a 17-day delay fell outside the Tribunal&#039;s power to condone it. The condonation application was therefore rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459330</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>