<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 1468 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459331</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) remand order, emphasizing the necessity of observing natural justice principles in administrative decisions with adverse consequences for the appellant. The Tribunal found no infirmity in the remand, which allowed comprehensive reconsideration of the MEIS Scheme benefit request by the adjudicating authority, ensuring a just resolution. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the importance of legal precedents in requiring the observance of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2024 19:05:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=781615" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 1468 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459331</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) remand order, emphasizing the necessity of observing natural justice principles in administrative decisions with adverse consequences for the appellant. The Tribunal found no infirmity in the remand, which allowed comprehensive reconsideration of the MEIS Scheme benefit request by the adjudicating authority, ensuring a just resolution. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the importance of legal precedents in requiring the observance of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459331</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>