https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459316 Civil court jurisdiction under Section 9 CPC continues over suits of a civil nature unless expressly or impliedly barred, and the burden to prove such exclusion lies on the party asserting it. A challenge to rejection of a suit under Order VII Rule 11 failed because the dispute involved civil rights concerning company property, and the record did not show any clear ouster of civil jurisdiction or manifest illegality in the trial court's view that the suit was maintainable. In the absence of a demonstrated bar, writ interference was not warranted. en-us Tue, 11 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Dec 2024 12:37:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459316 Civil court jurisdiction under Section 9 CPC continues over suits of a civil nature unless expressly or impliedly barred, and the burden to prove such exclusion lies on the party asserting it. A challenge to rejection of a suit under Order VII Rule 11 failed because the dispute involved civil rights concerning company property, and the record did not show any clear ouster of civil jurisdiction or manifest illegality in the trial court's view that the suit was maintainable. In the absence of a demonstrated bar, writ interference was not warranted. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 11 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459316