<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Upholds Tribunal Decision: Tax Registration Cancellation of Society Invalid Due to Lack of Retroactive Authority.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83811</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order setting aside the cancellation of registration granted u/s 12A to the assessee-society. The Court held that the Commissioner of Income Tax did not have retrospective jurisdiction to cancel the registration from 2004-05 as the power was conferred only by the 2010 amendment. Even prospectively, cancellation was not warranted as the society&#039;s activities of constructing buildings and establishing a college and hospital were incidental to its charitable objects. Transferring funds to another society for establishing hospitals in other districts could not be a ground for cancellation. The cancellation of registration can only be prospective, not retrospective. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2024 11:23:13 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2024 11:23:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=781567" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Upholds Tribunal Decision: Tax Registration Cancellation of Society Invalid Due to Lack of Retroactive Authority.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83811</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order setting aside the cancellation of registration granted u/s 12A to the assessee-society. The Court held that the Commissioner of Income Tax did not have retrospective jurisdiction to cancel the registration from 2004-05 as the power was conferred only by the 2010 amendment. Even prospectively, cancellation was not warranted as the society&#039;s activities of constructing buildings and establishing a college and hospital were incidental to its charitable objects. Transferring funds to another society for establishing hospitals in other districts could not be a ground for cancellation. The cancellation of registration can only be prospective, not retrospective. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2024 11:23:13 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83811</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>