https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83800 The High Court held that the co-insurance premium and reinsurance commission would not be considered as supply and thus, the petitioners are entitled to a refund. The amounts deposited by the petitioner were not towards discharge of tax liability, but merely deposits pursuant to the court's order pending final adjudication. Since the utilization of these amounts for tax payment was deferred, they do not fall under the exclusions from refund under Schedule III of the CGST Act. Consequently, the impugned orders were set aside and the petitions allowed. en-us Mon, 09 Dec 2024 08:44:20 +0530 Mon, 09 Dec 2024 08:44:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83800 The High Court held that the co-insurance premium and reinsurance commission would not be considered as supply and thus, the petitioners are entitled to a refund. The amounts deposited by the petitioner were not towards discharge of tax liability, but merely deposits pursuant to the court's order pending final adjudication. Since the utilization of these amounts for tax payment was deferred, they do not fall under the exclusions from refund under Schedule III of the CGST Act. Consequently, the impugned orders were set aside and the petitions allowed. Highlights GST Mon, 09 Dec 2024 08:44:20 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83800