<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Financial firm fails to maintain net worth, settlement rejected despite opportunities.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83782</link>
    <description>The High Court rejected the petition challenging SEBI&#039;s decision to not accept the settlement applications. The petitioner&#039;s documents were deficient, and it failed to maintain the required net worth for the financial years 2019-2021, despite being granted multiple opportunities for compliance. The court held that SEBI fairly considered the settlement proposal, provided ample opportunities, and no breach of natural justice occurred. The decision-making process was not arbitrary or defective. The court upheld SEBI&#039;s decision, finding no grounds to interfere with the impugned communication rejecting the settlement applications due to the petitioner&#039;s persistent non-compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2024 08:44:20 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2024 08:44:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=781516" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Financial firm fails to maintain net worth, settlement rejected despite opportunities.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83782</link>
      <description>The High Court rejected the petition challenging SEBI&#039;s decision to not accept the settlement applications. The petitioner&#039;s documents were deficient, and it failed to maintain the required net worth for the financial years 2019-2021, despite being granted multiple opportunities for compliance. The court held that SEBI fairly considered the settlement proposal, provided ample opportunities, and no breach of natural justice occurred. The decision-making process was not arbitrary or defective. The court upheld SEBI&#039;s decision, finding no grounds to interfere with the impugned communication rejecting the settlement applications due to the petitioner&#039;s persistent non-compliance.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2024 08:44:20 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83782</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>