<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 423 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762843</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal in a search assessment case under section 153A. The assessing officer had treated share capital receipts as bogus income from shell companies based on documents found during search. The tribunal held that the AO failed to establish the seized documents were incriminating material before using them for section 68 proceedings. The AO worked backwards - first concluding investors were shell companies, then deeming documents incriminating. The tribunal found the original share capital transactions were already examined and accepted in earlier scrutiny assessments. The AO&#039;s approach was based on preconceived notions rather than proper examination of evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2024 08:44:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=781493" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 423 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762843</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal in a search assessment case under section 153A. The assessing officer had treated share capital receipts as bogus income from shell companies based on documents found during search. The tribunal held that the AO failed to establish the seized documents were incriminating material before using them for section 68 proceedings. The AO worked backwards - first concluding investors were shell companies, then deeming documents incriminating. The tribunal found the original share capital transactions were already examined and accepted in earlier scrutiny assessments. The AO&#039;s approach was based on preconceived notions rather than proper examination of evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762843</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>