<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 435 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762855</link>
    <description>A writ petition challenging a GST assessment order was not entertained because an effective statutory appeal was available under Section 107. The court noted that objections based on natural justice and disputes over sufficiency of evidence or other factual matters are ordinarily not examined in writ jurisdiction when an appellate remedy exists. The petition was dismissed, and the petitioner was left free to pursue the statutory appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2025 13:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=781481" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 435 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762855</link>
      <description>A writ petition challenging a GST assessment order was not entertained because an effective statutory appeal was available under Section 107. The court noted that objections based on natural justice and disputes over sufficiency of evidence or other factual matters are ordinarily not examined in writ jurisdiction when an appellate remedy exists. The petition was dismissed, and the petitioner was left free to pursue the statutory appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762855</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>