https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762859 The HC dismissed the appeal challenging the impugned order and GST demand summary, allowing the petitioners to file an appeal once the appellate Tribunal president assumes office under Section 107 of the Act, 2017. The petitioners must deposit 20% of the remaining disputed tax amount, if not already paid, in addition to prior deposits under Section 107(6) of the B.G.S.T. Act, to avail the statutory stay under Section 112(9). The court held that petitioners cannot be denied this benefit due to the respondents' failure to constitute the Tribunal. The petition was disposed accordingly. en-us Wed, 27 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Jul 2025 14:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762859 The HC dismissed the appeal challenging the impugned order and GST demand summary, allowing the petitioners to file an appeal once the appellate Tribunal president assumes office under Section 107 of the Act, 2017. The petitioners must deposit 20% of the remaining disputed tax amount, if not already paid, in addition to prior deposits under Section 107(6) of the B.G.S.T. Act, to avail the statutory stay under Section 112(9). The court held that petitioners cannot be denied this benefit due to the respondents' failure to constitute the Tribunal. The petition was disposed accordingly. Case-Laws GST Wed, 27 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762859