<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 453 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762873</link>
    <description>A writ petition challenging a confiscation order under the Uttarakhand GST Act was declined because a statutory appeal under Section 107 was available. The Court treated the appellate remedy as efficacious and held that the alleged issues regarding service of the order and upload on the GST portal did not displace that remedy. The petitioner was therefore left to pursue the statutory appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2025 13:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=781463" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 453 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762873</link>
      <description>A writ petition challenging a confiscation order under the Uttarakhand GST Act was declined because a statutory appeal under Section 107 was available. The Court treated the appellate remedy as efficacious and held that the alleged issues regarding service of the order and upload on the GST portal did not displace that remedy. The petitioner was therefore left to pursue the statutory appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762873</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>