<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1973 (11) TMI 31 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39600</link>
    <description>Section 59 of the Estate Duty Act, 1953, was held to create a substantive new power to call for a fresh account and reassess escaped property de novo, unlike section 62 which only allowed limited rectification and additional duty in specified cases. As a result, the provision was construed as prospective only, since no express language or necessary implication showed an intention to make it retrospective. Reopening assessments that had already become final before 1 July 1960 was therefore bad in law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 10:52:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=78146" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1973 (11) TMI 31 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39600</link>
      <description>Section 59 of the Estate Duty Act, 1953, was held to create a substantive new power to call for a fresh account and reassess escaped property de novo, unlike section 62 which only allowed limited rectification and additional duty in specified cases. As a result, the provision was construed as prospective only, since no express language or necessary implication showed an intention to make it retrospective. Reopening assessments that had already become final before 1 July 1960 was therefore bad in law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39600</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>