<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1830 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459291</link>
    <description>Bail once granted may be cancelled where the granting court ignores relevant prima facie material or rests on irrelevant or incomplete considerations. The Delhi HC noted that bail is not to involve a minute trial-like examination, but cancellation is justified where the order is perverse and causes miscarriage of justice. On the record, eyewitness statements, recoveries, the circumstances of occurrence, and CCTV photographs collectively indicated the respondent&#039;s presence and participation; the trial court&#039;s reliance on incomplete CCTV footage to infer no involvement was therefore found presumptive. The regular bail order was held unsustainable and was cancelled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2024 16:53:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=781458" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1830 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459291</link>
      <description>Bail once granted may be cancelled where the granting court ignores relevant prima facie material or rests on irrelevant or incomplete considerations. The Delhi HC noted that bail is not to involve a minute trial-like examination, but cancellation is justified where the order is perverse and causes miscarriage of justice. On the record, eyewitness statements, recoveries, the circumstances of occurrence, and CCTV photographs collectively indicated the respondent&#039;s presence and participation; the trial court&#039;s reliance on incomplete CCTV footage to infer no involvement was therefore found presumptive. The regular bail order was held unsustainable and was cancelled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459291</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>