<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 1292 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459294</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed a winding up petition filed under Companies Act, 1956 against a hospital company for unpaid debt of Rs. 5,96,907/-. The court found the respondent company financially healthy and operating profitably. While acknowledging the debt, the court noted a genuine dispute regarding Rs. 3,64,000/- for a pacemaker supply, where payment was contingent on reimbursement from ECHS. The respondent demonstrated willingness to pay undisputed amounts within one month and the disputed amount upon receiving ECHS reimbursement. Given the company&#039;s financial viability and readiness to settle debts, winding up was deemed inappropriate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Dec 2024 19:39:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=781455" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 1292 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459294</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed a winding up petition filed under Companies Act, 1956 against a hospital company for unpaid debt of Rs. 5,96,907/-. The court found the respondent company financially healthy and operating profitably. While acknowledging the debt, the court noted a genuine dispute regarding Rs. 3,64,000/- for a pacemaker supply, where payment was contingent on reimbursement from ECHS. The respondent demonstrated willingness to pay undisputed amounts within one month and the disputed amount upon receiving ECHS reimbursement. Given the company&#039;s financial viability and readiness to settle debts, winding up was deemed inappropriate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459294</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>