https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83780 The High Court allowed the petition and quashed the order, declaring that the appellant shall not be seen as having availed excess credit for initiating proceedings u/s 73 of the GST Act. The case revealed no wrong availment of credit, and the appellant's mistake of omitting to mention IGST figures separately in Form GSTR 3A was inadvertent and technical, insignificant as there was no outward supply attracting IGST. Proceedings u/s 73 are attracted only when tax has not been paid, short paid, erroneously refunded, or input tax wrongly availed or utilised, which did not occur in this case. en-us Sat, 07 Dec 2024 08:14:54 +0530 Sat, 07 Dec 2024 08:14:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83780 The High Court allowed the petition and quashed the order, declaring that the appellant shall not be seen as having availed excess credit for initiating proceedings u/s 73 of the GST Act. The case revealed no wrong availment of credit, and the appellant's mistake of omitting to mention IGST figures separately in Form GSTR 3A was inadvertent and technical, insignificant as there was no outward supply attracting IGST. Proceedings u/s 73 are attracted only when tax has not been paid, short paid, erroneously refunded, or input tax wrongly availed or utilised, which did not occur in this case. Highlights GST Sat, 07 Dec 2024 08:14:54 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83780