<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 343 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762763</link>
    <description>CESTAT Allahabad dismissed appeal involving clandestine removal of goods through fictitious invoices. Appellant company issued documents in names of non-existent firms to clear finished goods across multiple states, receiving cash payments while legitimate sales were paid by cheque. Searches at factory premises, residential locations, and transporter facilities revealed systematic scheme involving multiple parties. Evidence included transport documents, customer admissions of receipt and cash payments, and continued violations post-search. Tribunal upheld central excise duty demands, CENVAT credit recovery with interest, and penalties on all appellants as habitual offenders involved in conspiracy to defraud exchequer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2024 11:34:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=781380" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 343 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762763</link>
      <description>CESTAT Allahabad dismissed appeal involving clandestine removal of goods through fictitious invoices. Appellant company issued documents in names of non-existent firms to clear finished goods across multiple states, receiving cash payments while legitimate sales were paid by cheque. Searches at factory premises, residential locations, and transporter facilities revealed systematic scheme involving multiple parties. Evidence included transport documents, customer admissions of receipt and cash payments, and continued violations post-search. Tribunal upheld central excise duty demands, CENVAT credit recovery with interest, and penalties on all appellants as habitual offenders involved in conspiracy to defraud exchequer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762763</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>