<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 358 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762778</link>
    <description>Under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, the amount payable was confined to the prescribed percentage of the disputed excise duty, and redemption fine was not to be treated as outside the Scheme&#039;s relief where the duty component had been settled. The Bombay HC analysis noted that once the covered tax dues were discharged, no further duty, interest, penalty, or fine could survive in respect of that dispute, and redemption fine was treated as akin to penalty for this purpose. Rejection of the declaration on the footing that redemption fine was excluded was therefore contrary to the governing interpretation, and the declaration could not be denied on that ground.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Dec 2024 08:14:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=781365" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 358 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762778</link>
      <description>Under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, the amount payable was confined to the prescribed percentage of the disputed excise duty, and redemption fine was not to be treated as outside the Scheme&#039;s relief where the duty component had been settled. The Bombay HC analysis noted that once the covered tax dues were discharged, no further duty, interest, penalty, or fine could survive in respect of that dispute, and redemption fine was treated as akin to penalty for this purpose. Rejection of the declaration on the footing that redemption fine was excluded was therefore contrary to the governing interpretation, and the declaration could not be denied on that ground.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762778</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>