https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459253 The HC denied the respondent's adjournment request, suspecting delay tactics. The court found the respondent's defense against the petitioner's winding-up notice unsubstantiated, as the final bill was certified by the Project Management Consultant. The court emphasized the binding nature of the certification and principles for winding-up proceedings. The respondent was granted time to deposit the due amount, with a Provisional Liquidator to be appointed if payment was not made. The Company Application was disposed of, with a further consideration date set. en-us Thu, 13 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 06 Dec 2024 14:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459253 The HC denied the respondent's adjournment request, suspecting delay tactics. The court found the respondent's defense against the petitioner's winding-up notice unsubstantiated, as the final bill was certified by the Project Management Consultant. The court emphasized the binding nature of the certification and principles for winding-up proceedings. The respondent was granted time to deposit the due amount, with a Provisional Liquidator to be appointed if payment was not made. The Company Application was disposed of, with a further consideration date set. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 13 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459253