https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762724 The High Court set aside the impugned orders dated March 28, 2018, and October 11, 2017, due to the absence of a show cause notice and a hearing opportunity for the petitioner, an Independent Director, which violated principles of natural justice. The Court found that the petitioner had not been properly notified, despite claims by the respondents. The Court emphasized the necessity of adhering to natural justice principles when imposing civil liabilities and allowed the respondents to issue a proper notice if they wished to proceed. All other issues, including the petitioner's status and resignation, were left open for future consideration. The rule was made absolute without any cost order. en-us Tue, 03 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 06 Dec 2024 08:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762724 The High Court set aside the impugned orders dated March 28, 2018, and October 11, 2017, due to the absence of a show cause notice and a hearing opportunity for the petitioner, an Independent Director, which violated principles of natural justice. The Court found that the petitioner had not been properly notified, despite claims by the respondents. The Court emphasized the necessity of adhering to natural justice principles when imposing civil liabilities and allowed the respondents to issue a proper notice if they wished to proceed. All other issues, including the petitioner's status and resignation, were left open for future consideration. The rule was made absolute without any cost order. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 03 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762724