https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762752 The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by the Petitioner challenging the order of the Joint Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise. The Court emphasized that the Petitioner must exhaust the alternate remedy available under Section 107 of the CGST Act before seeking judicial intervention. The Court rejected the Petitioner's argument that the pre-deposit requirement justified bypassing the statutory appeal process, noting that such requirements cannot be circumvented without sufficient cause. The Court refrained from commenting on the merits of the case to preserve the Petitioner's right to appeal, underscoring the necessity of adhering to statutory procedures and remedies. en-us Wed, 13 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 06 Dec 2024 08:47:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762752 The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by the Petitioner challenging the order of the Joint Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise. The Court emphasized that the Petitioner must exhaust the alternate remedy available under Section 107 of the CGST Act before seeking judicial intervention. The Court rejected the Petitioner's argument that the pre-deposit requirement justified bypassing the statutory appeal process, noting that such requirements cannot be circumvented without sufficient cause. The Court refrained from commenting on the merits of the case to preserve the Petitioner's right to appeal, underscoring the necessity of adhering to statutory procedures and remedies. Case-Laws GST Wed, 13 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762752