https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762759 A writ petition under Article 226 will ordinarily not be entertained where an efficacious alternate remedy is available, unless sufficient grounds exist to depart from that rule. On the facts stated, the pleadings did not disclose any adequate basis to bypass the appellate mechanism, so writ intervention was declined. The petitioner was relegated to the alternate remedy of appeal, with liberty to file it within the stated period, and the matter was disposed of without entertaining the writ petition at that stage. en-us Mon, 02 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Jul 2025 13:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762759 A writ petition under Article 226 will ordinarily not be entertained where an efficacious alternate remedy is available, unless sufficient grounds exist to depart from that rule. On the facts stated, the pleadings did not disclose any adequate basis to bypass the appellate mechanism, so writ intervention was declined. The petitioner was relegated to the alternate remedy of appeal, with liberty to file it within the stated period, and the matter was disposed of without entertaining the writ petition at that stage. Case-Laws GST Mon, 02 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762759