<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 341 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762761</link>
    <description>An interest recovery order under the Uttar Pradesh GST Act was held unsustainable because the authority failed to consider the petitioner&#039;s e-mailed reply to the notice, even though receipt of that reply was not disputed. The omission vitiated the decision-making process, so the order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration after taking the reply into account. The stated principle is that an order passed without considering a duly submitted response cannot be sustained and must be reconsidered in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 18:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=781116" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 341 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762761</link>
      <description>An interest recovery order under the Uttar Pradesh GST Act was held unsustainable because the authority failed to consider the petitioner&#039;s e-mailed reply to the notice, even though receipt of that reply was not disputed. The omission vitiated the decision-making process, so the order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration after taking the reply into account. The stated principle is that an order passed without considering a duly submitted response cannot be sustained and must be reconsidered in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762761</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>