<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 1072 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459223</link>
    <description>Statutory vesting had overtaken the debenture trust deed dispute, and no debenture holder had asserted an enforceable claim, so the debenture-related challenges were treated as academic and not decided on merits. The long-unused sales and commission arrangements, together with the linked oppression and mismanagement allegations, were also held to have lost practical significance after the takeover, so no substantive relief was granted. The Mazgaon Docks property dispute, involving tenancy, subletting, termination and possession issues, was held to belong before the Small Causes Court in Bombay rather than in these proceedings, and the petition was disposed of without surviving substantive controversy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2024 15:51:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=781023" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 1072 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459223</link>
      <description>Statutory vesting had overtaken the debenture trust deed dispute, and no debenture holder had asserted an enforceable claim, so the debenture-related challenges were treated as academic and not decided on merits. The long-unused sales and commission arrangements, together with the linked oppression and mismanagement allegations, were also held to have lost practical significance after the takeover, so no substantive relief was granted. The Mazgaon Docks property dispute, involving tenancy, subletting, termination and possession issues, was held to belong before the Small Causes Court in Bombay rather than in these proceedings, and the petition was disposed of without surviving substantive controversy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459223</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>