<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 1235 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459219</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the petition for winding up the respondent company, concluding that the petitioner could not claim the amount of Rs. 3,64,773/- again. The court determined that this amount was included in the settlement with Focus Brands, as evidenced by the petitioner&#039;s email, and thus extinguished the respondent&#039;s debt. No order as to costs was made.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2024 15:22:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=781002" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 1235 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459219</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the petition for winding up the respondent company, concluding that the petitioner could not claim the amount of Rs. 3,64,773/- again. The court determined that this amount was included in the settlement with Focus Brands, as evidenced by the petitioner&#039;s email, and thus extinguished the respondent&#039;s debt. No order as to costs was made.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459219</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>