<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 1234 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459220</link>
    <description>The HC ruled in favor of the party who paid the settlement amount, directing PICUP to return the settlement amount within three weeks. PICUP&#039;s application to withhold the title deeds was dismissed, as the issue was resolved by the return of funds. Another application regarding property purchase or auction was deemed infructuous and dismissed. The judgment underscored the necessity of adhering to settlement terms and ensuring equitable resolution of financial disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2024 15:22:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=781001" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 1234 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459220</link>
      <description>The HC ruled in favor of the party who paid the settlement amount, directing PICUP to return the settlement amount within three weeks. PICUP&#039;s application to withhold the title deeds was dismissed, as the issue was resolved by the return of funds. Another application regarding property purchase or auction was deemed infructuous and dismissed. The judgment underscored the necessity of adhering to settlement terms and ensuring equitable resolution of financial disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459220</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>