<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 1188 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459217</link>
    <description>Balance sheet entries and a subsequent letter acknowledging liability were treated as acknowledgment of debt and as keeping the claim within limitation. After service of a statutory demand under the Companies Act, the respondent neither replied nor paid, so the debt was treated as admitted, undisputed, and unpaid. On that basis, the material supported winding up on the ground of neglect to pay an admitted debt, together with interim winding-up directions and appointment of the Official Liquidator as provisional liquidator.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2024 14:08:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=780983" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 1188 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459217</link>
      <description>Balance sheet entries and a subsequent letter acknowledging liability were treated as acknowledgment of debt and as keeping the claim within limitation. After service of a statutory demand under the Companies Act, the respondent neither replied nor paid, so the debt was treated as admitted, undisputed, and unpaid. On that basis, the material supported winding up on the ground of neglect to pay an admitted debt, together with interim winding-up directions and appointment of the Official Liquidator as provisional liquidator.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459217</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>