https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762639 The court dismissed the Petitioner's attempt to bypass alternate remedies, emphasizing the necessity of exhausting available remedies under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002. The Petitioner's argument that the dispute was settled under the Maharashtra Settlement of Arrears of Tax, Interest, Penalty or Late Fee Act, 2019 was rejected. The court imposed costs of Rs. 1,00,000 on the Petitioner for misleading assertions, directing payments to Tata Memorial Hospital and the High Court Class IV Employees' Association. The court allowed the Petitioner to file an appeal within four weeks after paying the costs, instructing the Appellate Authority to consider the appeal on merits without addressing the limitation issue, as the Petition was timely filed. The Petition was disposed of with directives for compliance and further action based on an authenticated order copy. en-us Mon, 02 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Dec 2024 08:37:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762639 The court dismissed the Petitioner's attempt to bypass alternate remedies, emphasizing the necessity of exhausting available remedies under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002. The Petitioner's argument that the dispute was settled under the Maharashtra Settlement of Arrears of Tax, Interest, Penalty or Late Fee Act, 2019 was rejected. The court imposed costs of Rs. 1,00,000 on the Petitioner for misleading assertions, directing payments to Tata Memorial Hospital and the High Court Class IV Employees' Association. The court allowed the Petitioner to file an appeal within four weeks after paying the costs, instructing the Appellate Authority to consider the appeal on merits without addressing the limitation issue, as the Petition was timely filed. The Petition was disposed of with directives for compliance and further action based on an authenticated order copy. Case-Laws VAT / Sales Tax Mon, 02 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762639