https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762639 Where an efficacious statutory appeal is available under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, writ jurisdiction will not ordinarily be invoked to bypass that remedy. The court held that objections about the settlement legislation, the alleged inability of the appellate forum to examine them, and the claim of lack of jurisdiction could be raised in appeal, and that bald or misleading averments did not justify departure from the rule of alternate remedy. In the absence of pleaded exceptional grounds, the writ petition was not entertainable and the party was required to pursue the statutory appellate process, leaving the merits open for the appellate authority. en-us Mon, 02 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Dec 2024 08:37:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762639 Where an efficacious statutory appeal is available under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, writ jurisdiction will not ordinarily be invoked to bypass that remedy. The court held that objections about the settlement legislation, the alleged inability of the appellate forum to examine them, and the claim of lack of jurisdiction could be raised in appeal, and that bald or misleading averments did not justify departure from the rule of alternate remedy. In the absence of pleaded exceptional grounds, the writ petition was not entertainable and the party was required to pursue the statutory appellate process, leaving the merits open for the appellate authority. Case-Laws VAT / Sales Tax Mon, 02 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762639