https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762644 The Court concluded that the respondents failed to justify the non-consideration of the petitioner's application under the SVLDRS Scheme due to the lack of evidence proving communication of SVLDRS Form-3. The Court mandated the respondents to review the petitioner's application and inform them of the payable amount within four weeks. Upon notification, the petitioner was required to make the payment within four weeks, after which the respondents were instructed to issue a discharge certificate. The judgment underscored the necessity of proving communication in an online scheme and affirmed the petitioner's entitlement to have their application duly considered. en-us Tue, 03 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Dec 2024 08:37:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762644 The Court concluded that the respondents failed to justify the non-consideration of the petitioner's application under the SVLDRS Scheme due to the lack of evidence proving communication of SVLDRS Form-3. The Court mandated the respondents to review the petitioner's application and inform them of the payable amount within four weeks. Upon notification, the petitioner was required to make the payment within four weeks, after which the respondents were instructed to issue a discharge certificate. The judgment underscored the necessity of proving communication in an online scheme and affirmed the petitioner's entitlement to have their application duly considered. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 03 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762644