<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 259 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762679</link>
    <description>The Delhi HC upheld the AO&#039;s decision to reopen assessment under Section 147 after finding that two entities supplying goods to the petitioner for garment exports were non-genuine. Despite petitioner&#039;s arguments about banking channel transactions and customs duty drawback, the court held that the AO had sufficient material indicating escaped income assessment. The investigation revealed non-existing suppliers at their registered addresses, with bank accounts showing matching inflows/outflows and high turnover in short periods. The court emphasized that at Section 148A stage, the AO only needs reasonable grounds to suspect income escapement, not conclusive proof. The petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2024 23:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=780894" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 259 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762679</link>
      <description>The Delhi HC upheld the AO&#039;s decision to reopen assessment under Section 147 after finding that two entities supplying goods to the petitioner for garment exports were non-genuine. Despite petitioner&#039;s arguments about banking channel transactions and customs duty drawback, the court held that the AO had sufficient material indicating escaped income assessment. The investigation revealed non-existing suppliers at their registered addresses, with bank accounts showing matching inflows/outflows and high turnover in short periods. The court emphasized that at Section 148A stage, the AO only needs reasonable grounds to suspect income escapement, not conclusive proof. The petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762679</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>