<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 1588 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459185</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the writ petition, affirming the petitioner&#039;s obligation to share live broadcast signals of sports events with Prasar Bharti without advertisements, as mandated by Section 3 of the Sports Broadcast Signals (Mandatory Sharing with Prasar Bharti) Act, 2007. The court upheld Rule 5 of the 2007 Rules, emphasizing compliance with domestic laws and the State&#039;s regulatory authority over public airwaves. The court did not entertain the constitutional challenge under Article 14, as the vires of Section 3 was not contested. The dismissal was without costs, acknowledging the petitioner&#039;s bona fide belief in their case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2024 21:50:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=780882" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 1588 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459185</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the writ petition, affirming the petitioner&#039;s obligation to share live broadcast signals of sports events with Prasar Bharti without advertisements, as mandated by Section 3 of the Sports Broadcast Signals (Mandatory Sharing with Prasar Bharti) Act, 2007. The court upheld Rule 5 of the 2007 Rules, emphasizing compliance with domestic laws and the State&#039;s regulatory authority over public airwaves. The court did not entertain the constitutional challenge under Article 14, as the vires of Section 3 was not contested. The dismissal was without costs, acknowledging the petitioner&#039;s bona fide belief in their case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459185</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>