https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459186 Photocopying library extracts into university course packs did not amount to copyright infringement where the copies were made for students' instructional use and not for commercial substitution of books. Section 52(1)(i) was held to cover reproduction by a teacher or pupil in the course of instruction, including syllabus preparation, prescribed readings and academic study throughout the session. The court further held that Section 52(1)(h) did not apply because the course packs were not mainly non-copyright material, and Section 52(1)(a) was displaced by the specific educational exception. The arrangement was therefore treated as protected educational use. en-us Fri, 16 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Dec 2024 21:50:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459186 Photocopying library extracts into university course packs did not amount to copyright infringement where the copies were made for students' instructional use and not for commercial substitution of books. Section 52(1)(i) was held to cover reproduction by a teacher or pupil in the course of instruction, including syllabus preparation, prescribed readings and academic study throughout the session. The court further held that Section 52(1)(h) did not apply because the course packs were not mainly non-copyright material, and Section 52(1)(a) was displaced by the specific educational exception. The arrangement was therefore treated as protected educational use. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 16 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459186