<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 1491 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459190</link>
    <description>Bail was refused during ongoing further investigation into alleged corruption in primary teacher recruitment, where the accused was described as playing a central role in collecting illegal gratification through agents and facilitating wrongful appointments. The Court considered the material to indicate a deep-rooted corruption network and noted that the allegations could extend beyond section 7A to graver offences under section 7 read with section 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act. Because the gravity of the alleged public corruption, the need to protect the investigation, the prospect of tracing proceeds of crime, and the risk of witness or candidate influence justified continued custody, bail was rejected at that stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2024 21:50:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=780877" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 1491 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459190</link>
      <description>Bail was refused during ongoing further investigation into alleged corruption in primary teacher recruitment, where the accused was described as playing a central role in collecting illegal gratification through agents and facilitating wrongful appointments. The Court considered the material to indicate a deep-rooted corruption network and noted that the allegations could extend beyond section 7A to graver offences under section 7 read with section 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act. Because the gravity of the alleged public corruption, the need to protect the investigation, the prospect of tracing proceeds of crime, and the risk of witness or candidate influence justified continued custody, bail was rejected at that stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459190</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>