https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459192 Madras HC allowed a criminal revision petition challenging postponement of PMLA trial. The court rejected maintainability objections, holding that revision petitions lie against orders under Section 309 Cr.P.C. The HC distinguished between FIR and ECIR proceedings, noting that pendency of criminal appeal against conviction does not bar continuation of PMLA trial. The court emphasized that blanket application of precedents without case-specific analysis would defeat PMLA's primary objectives. The impugned postponement order was quashed and trial directed to proceed. en-us Wed, 25 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Dec 2024 21:50:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459192 Madras HC allowed a criminal revision petition challenging postponement of PMLA trial. The court rejected maintainability objections, holding that revision petitions lie against orders under Section 309 Cr.P.C. The HC distinguished between FIR and ECIR proceedings, noting that pendency of criminal appeal against conviction does not bar continuation of PMLA trial. The court emphasized that blanket application of precedents without case-specific analysis would defeat PMLA's primary objectives. The impugned postponement order was quashed and trial directed to proceed. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 25 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459192