https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459192 A revision against an order postponing commencement of trial under Section 309 CrPC was held maintainable because the challenge concerned the correctness and propriety of a criminal court order and was not treated as a purely interlocutory matter. On the PMLA issue, the Court held that the Act is a special regime with overriding effect, and that PMLA proceedings are independent of the scheduled offence; therefore, mere pendency of an appeal in the predicate case did not justify keeping the PMLA trial in abeyance. The order postponing the PMLA trial was set aside and the trial court was directed to proceed. en-us Wed, 25 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Dec 2024 21:50:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459192 A revision against an order postponing commencement of trial under Section 309 CrPC was held maintainable because the challenge concerned the correctness and propriety of a criminal court order and was not treated as a purely interlocutory matter. On the PMLA issue, the Court held that the Act is a special regime with overriding effect, and that PMLA proceedings are independent of the scheduled offence; therefore, mere pendency of an appeal in the predicate case did not justify keeping the PMLA trial in abeyance. The order postponing the PMLA trial was set aside and the trial court was directed to proceed. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 25 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459192