<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (8) TMI 31 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39528</link>
    <description>Expenditure is deductible under section 10(2)(xv) when it is laid out wholly and exclusively for the business, assessed from the standpoint of a prudent businessman, not by the revenue&#039;s own view of reasonableness. A tax authority may refuse deduction only where the payment is unreal, extraneous, extra-commercial, or wholly disproportionate to the business or comparable payments; it cannot merely reduce remuneration because an outsider might have worked for less. On the facts discussed, there was no evidence of lack of business purpose, so the disallowance of the managing director&#039;s remuneration was unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 11:14:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=78074" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (8) TMI 31 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39528</link>
      <description>Expenditure is deductible under section 10(2)(xv) when it is laid out wholly and exclusively for the business, assessed from the standpoint of a prudent businessman, not by the revenue&#039;s own view of reasonableness. A tax authority may refuse deduction only where the payment is unreal, extraneous, extra-commercial, or wholly disproportionate to the business or comparable payments; it cannot merely reduce remuneration because an outsider might have worked for less. On the facts discussed, there was no evidence of lack of business purpose, so the disallowance of the managing director&#039;s remuneration was unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39528</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>