<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>SCN due date S. 73</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=119442</link>
    <description>The deadline for issuing a show-cause notice under Section 73 CGST is disputed: some practitioners apply the General Clauses Act, 1897 to read &quot;prior to&quot; as inclusive of the terminal date when computing a three-month period, while others apply calendar-month reckoning and exclude the terminal date. The correspondence cites case law and warns that reliance on procedural invalidity alone is risky, recommending preservation of merits defences and, where appropriate, writ remedies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2024 09:34:09 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2025 10:40:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=780713" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>SCN due date S. 73</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=119442</link>
      <description>The deadline for issuing a show-cause notice under Section 73 CGST is disputed: some practitioners apply the General Clauses Act, 1897 to read &quot;prior to&quot; as inclusive of the terminal date when computing a three-month period, while others apply calendar-month reckoning and exclude the terminal date. The correspondence cites case law and warns that reliance on procedural invalidity alone is risky, recommending preservation of merits defences and, where appropriate, writ remedies.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2024 09:34:09 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=119442</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>