<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 151 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762571</link>
    <description>Gujarat HC held that petitioner was entitled to exemption from excise duty on transit loss up to 1% for Naphtha and ATF cleared for export. The court found that revisional authority incorrectly ignored Notification No. 46/2001 which permits duty-free removal of petroleum products for export warehousing. Under Circular No. 261/1985, petitioner was entitled to transit loss exemption until goods reached warehouse for export purposes. The court distinguished storage loss (covered by Circular No. 804/2005) from transit loss claimed by petitioner. Demand for duty, interest and penalty was quashed, and Commissioner (Appeals) order was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2024 08:44:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=780671" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 151 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762571</link>
      <description>Gujarat HC held that petitioner was entitled to exemption from excise duty on transit loss up to 1% for Naphtha and ATF cleared for export. The court found that revisional authority incorrectly ignored Notification No. 46/2001 which permits duty-free removal of petroleum products for export warehousing. Under Circular No. 261/1985, petitioner was entitled to transit loss exemption until goods reached warehouse for export purposes. The court distinguished storage loss (covered by Circular No. 804/2005) from transit loss claimed by petitioner. Demand for duty, interest and penalty was quashed, and Commissioner (Appeals) order was restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762571</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>