<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 166 - NATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING AUTHORITY (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762586</link>
    <description>An auditor of a public interest entity was found to have failed to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence on inventory existence and valuation, investments, consolidation and impairment, revenue, trade receivables, documentation, and communication with those charged with governance. The record showed inadequate testing, deficient sampling, incomplete working papers, and no proper basis for key accounting judgments. These lapses were treated as serious departures from auditing standards and statutory duties, amounting to lack of due diligence, gross negligence, failure to report material misstatements, and failure to obtain sufficient information for an opinion. Professional misconduct was established, and monetary penalty with temporary debarment was justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2024 08:44:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=780656" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 166 - NATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING AUTHORITY (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762586</link>
      <description>An auditor of a public interest entity was found to have failed to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence on inventory existence and valuation, investments, consolidation and impairment, revenue, trade receivables, documentation, and communication with those charged with governance. The record showed inadequate testing, deficient sampling, incomplete working papers, and no proper basis for key accounting judgments. These lapses were treated as serious departures from auditing standards and statutory duties, amounting to lack of due diligence, gross negligence, failure to report material misstatements, and failure to obtain sufficient information for an opinion. Professional misconduct was established, and monetary penalty with temporary debarment was justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762586</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>