<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 168 - NATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING AUTHORITY - LB</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762588</link>
    <description>A disclaimer of opinion did not relieve the auditor of duties of professional skepticism, fraud reporting, adequate audit evidence, proper documentation, or compliance reporting. NFRA found gross negligence in failing to act on fraud indicators such as rising expected credit loss provisions, defaulted borrowings, fresh credit sales to defaulters, and insolvency proceedings, and held that the audit file lacked adequate fraud-focused examination. It also found insufficient appropriate audit evidence on non-current investments, deficient impairment assessment, missing and incomplete audit documentation, and inadequate reporting of property, plant and equipment restrictions and the basis for the internal financial controls disclaimer. Professional misconduct was found proved and a monetary penalty was imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2024 12:38:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=780654" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 168 - NATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING AUTHORITY - LB</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762588</link>
      <description>A disclaimer of opinion did not relieve the auditor of duties of professional skepticism, fraud reporting, adequate audit evidence, proper documentation, or compliance reporting. NFRA found gross negligence in failing to act on fraud indicators such as rising expected credit loss provisions, defaulted borrowings, fresh credit sales to defaulters, and insolvency proceedings, and held that the audit file lacked adequate fraud-focused examination. It also found insufficient appropriate audit evidence on non-current investments, deficient impairment assessment, missing and incomplete audit documentation, and inadequate reporting of property, plant and equipment restrictions and the basis for the internal financial controls disclaimer. Professional misconduct was found proved and a monetary penalty was imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762588</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>