<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 170 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762590</link>
    <description>CESTAT Mumbai set aside the Commissioner of Customs&#039; order continuing suspension of a Customs Broker&#039;s license. The appellant CB was charged with violating CBLR 2018 regulations 10(d), 10(e), 10(k), and 10(n) regarding due diligence in export declarations. The Tribunal found the suspension order non-compliant with Regulation 16 requirements, lacking justification for immediate suspension nearly four years after the alleged January 2019 overvaluation incident. No evidence established the CB&#039;s role in export goods overvaluation. The Commissioner failed to demonstrate appropriateness for continued suspension under Regulation 16. The Tribunal directed completion of inquiry proceedings under Regulation 17 within six months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2024 08:44:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=780652" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 170 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762590</link>
      <description>CESTAT Mumbai set aside the Commissioner of Customs&#039; order continuing suspension of a Customs Broker&#039;s license. The appellant CB was charged with violating CBLR 2018 regulations 10(d), 10(e), 10(k), and 10(n) regarding due diligence in export declarations. The Tribunal found the suspension order non-compliant with Regulation 16 requirements, lacking justification for immediate suspension nearly four years after the alleged January 2019 overvaluation incident. No evidence established the CB&#039;s role in export goods overvaluation. The Commissioner failed to demonstrate appropriateness for continued suspension under Regulation 16. The Tribunal directed completion of inquiry proceedings under Regulation 17 within six months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762590</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>