<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 179 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762599</link>
    <description>Gold jewellery worn on a foreign passenger&#039;s body was treated as personal baggage rather than concealed import under the customs and baggage regime. The court found that the gold chain and kara were not brought in a clandestine manner, and the authorities had misapplied the governing rules. As the case did not involve concealment attracting confiscatory action, the seizure, confiscation, customs duty demand, and penalty were unsustainable and were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2024 19:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=780643" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 179 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762599</link>
      <description>Gold jewellery worn on a foreign passenger&#039;s body was treated as personal baggage rather than concealed import under the customs and baggage regime. The court found that the gold chain and kara were not brought in a clandestine manner, and the authorities had misapplied the governing rules. As the case did not involve concealment attracting confiscatory action, the seizure, confiscation, customs duty demand, and penalty were unsustainable and were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762599</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>