<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 210 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762630</link>
    <description>Penalty for transport of goods with an expired e-way bill cannot be sustained on a mere technical lapse where the transaction is otherwise duly documented and reflected in returns, with no discrepancy, diversion, or evidence of tax evasion. The Court treated GST penalty as requiring a contextual assessment and held that, absent a recorded finding of mala fide intention, wilful evasion, or lack of bona fides, detention and penalty are unwarranted. The penalty orders were therefore set aside and relief granted to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 21:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=780612" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 210 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762630</link>
      <description>Penalty for transport of goods with an expired e-way bill cannot be sustained on a mere technical lapse where the transaction is otherwise duly documented and reflected in returns, with no discrepancy, diversion, or evidence of tax evasion. The Court treated GST penalty as requiring a contextual assessment and held that, absent a recorded finding of mala fide intention, wilful evasion, or lack of bona fides, detention and penalty are unwarranted. The penalty orders were therefore set aside and relief granted to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762630</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>